Post by account_disabled on Feb 13, 2024 20:27:00 GMT -8
In the Tsunami case, terrorism is a trap designed by Judge García Castellón in connection with an undetermined number of judges and prosecutors with the immediate purpose of interrupting the approval of the amnesty law and, in the immediate future, of blowing up the legislature The title comes from Justice Potter Stewart's concurring opinion in the 1964 Jacobellis v. Ohio case. This was a case in which the content and scope of the First Amendment in relation to obscenity and pornography was at stake. In a movie theater in Ohio, the movie ' The Lovers ' had been shown, which contained a sex scene. The question that the Supreme Court (SC) had to address is whether the owner of the cinema could be sanctioned for showing pornographic material. The problem for the Supreme Court is that there was no precise legal definition of obscenity and pornography in the American legal system. Every time throughout the debate that the justices seemed to have a definition at hand, they encountered exceptions that made it unviable. Despite this, the Supreme Court decided by a majority of 6 to 3 that obscenity and pornography could be punished, but that the film in question did not constitute pornography.
Days later, these judicial data – and in theory reserved – reached the pages of El Mundo. The headline: “ The president of Las Palmas confirms his business with Rosell's partner .” Later José Manuel Soria expanded his complaint against the Podemos deputy, based on “the published information.” And so, by Pakistan Phone Number List land, sea and air, the pressure grew against the judge who had been too brave to enter politics through the wrong door. Then the Supreme Court arrived. That in April 2016, José Manuel Soria's complaint was admitted for processing. Victoria Rosell had to resign, leave the Permanent Deputation of Congress – new elections were called – and leave her seat. Since she was accused, she could not repeat in the following elections either. Judge Salvador Alba triumphed, but for a short time. An unforeseen event thwarted the impunity of his crimes. Businessman Miguel Ángel Ramírez had recorded the secret meeting between the two. In May 2016, elDiario.es published the audios. The entire conspiracy came to light, and the Rosell case became the Alba case . The first reaction of some judges to this textbook prevarication? It was not exemplary. The Professional Association of the Judiciary (APM) – a conservative association, the largest, to which almost a quarter of all Spanish judges belong – came out to defend him. “There is no problem in receiving, as an act of transparency, whoever requests it.
All judges do it, said Manuel Almenar, then president of the APM and previously a member of the CGPJ at the proposal of the PP, in his defense –Almenar is today a judge of the Supreme Court; He was appointed in 2021 by the current CGPJ, when his mandate had already expired. Alba had been the president of the APM in the Canary Islands. He was one of theirs. And not just any one. But the evidence was compelling. And they didn't allow for much interpretation. Despite this first support, the investigation against Victoria Rosell was archived. And a new court case was opened against Judge Alba, which little by little began to advance. And so we come to the new information from Canarias Ahora and Carlos Sosa. Those that will now take our colleague to the bench, accused of the crimes of “hate”, “harassment” and “revelation of secrets”, with a possible sentence of 23 years in prison. When the trial began, obviously, Salvador Alba was suspended. He had to leave his court since he was going to sit in the dock as a defendant. And to avoid this, he requested a somewhat peculiar medical leave.
Days later, these judicial data – and in theory reserved – reached the pages of El Mundo. The headline: “ The president of Las Palmas confirms his business with Rosell's partner .” Later José Manuel Soria expanded his complaint against the Podemos deputy, based on “the published information.” And so, by Pakistan Phone Number List land, sea and air, the pressure grew against the judge who had been too brave to enter politics through the wrong door. Then the Supreme Court arrived. That in April 2016, José Manuel Soria's complaint was admitted for processing. Victoria Rosell had to resign, leave the Permanent Deputation of Congress – new elections were called – and leave her seat. Since she was accused, she could not repeat in the following elections either. Judge Salvador Alba triumphed, but for a short time. An unforeseen event thwarted the impunity of his crimes. Businessman Miguel Ángel Ramírez had recorded the secret meeting between the two. In May 2016, elDiario.es published the audios. The entire conspiracy came to light, and the Rosell case became the Alba case . The first reaction of some judges to this textbook prevarication? It was not exemplary. The Professional Association of the Judiciary (APM) – a conservative association, the largest, to which almost a quarter of all Spanish judges belong – came out to defend him. “There is no problem in receiving, as an act of transparency, whoever requests it.
All judges do it, said Manuel Almenar, then president of the APM and previously a member of the CGPJ at the proposal of the PP, in his defense –Almenar is today a judge of the Supreme Court; He was appointed in 2021 by the current CGPJ, when his mandate had already expired. Alba had been the president of the APM in the Canary Islands. He was one of theirs. And not just any one. But the evidence was compelling. And they didn't allow for much interpretation. Despite this first support, the investigation against Victoria Rosell was archived. And a new court case was opened against Judge Alba, which little by little began to advance. And so we come to the new information from Canarias Ahora and Carlos Sosa. Those that will now take our colleague to the bench, accused of the crimes of “hate”, “harassment” and “revelation of secrets”, with a possible sentence of 23 years in prison. When the trial began, obviously, Salvador Alba was suspended. He had to leave his court since he was going to sit in the dock as a defendant. And to avoid this, he requested a somewhat peculiar medical leave.