Post by account_disabled on Feb 14, 2024 21:55:55 GMT -8
The Constitutional Court received 8,528 requests for protection in 2022 . Of these, only 2.8% were processed and resulted in a sentence. This court handed down, throughout last year, 151 sentences, of which 116 resolved appeals for protection , of the 159 that had been admitted for processing.
The data is part of the annual report that this institution has just made public and which, once again, shows the enormous number of appeals for protection that are presented (99.27% of the cases) and how practically all, the 97.1% end up being archived . It is striking that, of the resources that are processed, the majority are estimated . Thus, 88 of the 116 sentences are favorable for the appellant.
The number of applications for protection that were presented to the Court of Guarantees in 2022 amounts to 8,528 in 2022, which represents an increase of 234 appeals compared to the previous year. According to the report, 53% were appeals for protection filed in relation to resolutions of the Criminal jurisdictional order , descending to the Civil orders, in which 1474 were presented, or Administrative Litigation. It does reflect, however, an increase in resources in the Social order , going from 334 to 407. Practically all of the new cases are promoted by individuals.
The majority of amparo appeals admitted for processing were “due to the concurrence of several reasons (46%); The second place was occupied by the absence of constitutional doctrine (15%) , followed by admissions based on the eventual refusal to comply with constitutional doctrine by judicial Algeria Email List resolutions (13.92%). Thirteen appeals were admitted because they allowed the constitutional doctrine to be clarified or changed after a process of internal reflection. Regarding the causes of inadmissibility, the data continue to show the predominance of the cause related to insufficient justification of the special constitutional significance (44%) , followed by that related to the lack of special constitutional significance (22.7%)” , details the memory.
Only on four of the 16 occasions in which the Public Prosecutor's Office filed an appeal against the order of inadmissibility of the amparo appeal, the estimate was accompanied by retroaction of the actions to reassess whether it met the admissibility requirements. 10 of the 16 appeals were dismissed.
The data is part of the annual report that this institution has just made public and which, once again, shows the enormous number of appeals for protection that are presented (99.27% of the cases) and how practically all, the 97.1% end up being archived . It is striking that, of the resources that are processed, the majority are estimated . Thus, 88 of the 116 sentences are favorable for the appellant.
The number of applications for protection that were presented to the Court of Guarantees in 2022 amounts to 8,528 in 2022, which represents an increase of 234 appeals compared to the previous year. According to the report, 53% were appeals for protection filed in relation to resolutions of the Criminal jurisdictional order , descending to the Civil orders, in which 1474 were presented, or Administrative Litigation. It does reflect, however, an increase in resources in the Social order , going from 334 to 407. Practically all of the new cases are promoted by individuals.
The majority of amparo appeals admitted for processing were “due to the concurrence of several reasons (46%); The second place was occupied by the absence of constitutional doctrine (15%) , followed by admissions based on the eventual refusal to comply with constitutional doctrine by judicial Algeria Email List resolutions (13.92%). Thirteen appeals were admitted because they allowed the constitutional doctrine to be clarified or changed after a process of internal reflection. Regarding the causes of inadmissibility, the data continue to show the predominance of the cause related to insufficient justification of the special constitutional significance (44%) , followed by that related to the lack of special constitutional significance (22.7%)” , details the memory.
Only on four of the 16 occasions in which the Public Prosecutor's Office filed an appeal against the order of inadmissibility of the amparo appeal, the estimate was accompanied by retroaction of the actions to reassess whether it met the admissibility requirements. 10 of the 16 appeals were dismissed.