Post by account_disabled on Feb 27, 2024 20:24:07 GMT -8
A huge explosion of interest in the pop sensation's love life has led to a rise in conspiracy theories. Does anyone have merit? Psychological operation: A military operation generally intended to influence the enemy's mood through non-combat means (such as distributing leaflets). Even if you're not a fan of pop superstar Taylor Swift, it's almost impossible that you haven't seen her image in paparazzi magazines and on television screens in recent months. As ZeroHedge reported, “Corporate media story counts about Swift have skyrocketed exponentially, averaging more than 1,000 per day since late September.” A slim majority of American adults (53%) identified themselves as Swift fans, according to a recent Morning Consult poll, while 16% identified themselves as "avid" fans of the "Anti Hero" singer. The singing sensation recently maximized his personality by connecting with Travis Kelce, a tight end for the Kansas City Chiefs football team. And as fate would have it, wouldn't you know that the Chiefs are on their way to the Super Bowl, the most famous sporting event in the United States? Nowadays, football announcers spend almost as much time covering Swift's outrageous antics from the stands cheering on his man as they do covering the action on the field.
Many people on the right think there's something too artificial, too stagey, too polished and perfect about this American Love Story, as if some powerful puppeteer were manipulating the made-for-TV saga from on high. In fact, none other than former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy suggested that Swift and Kuwait Mobile Number List Kelce's relationship paved the way for some free Democratic Party advertising. READ MORE Biden wants Taylor Swift to sing for him wonder who will win the Super Bowl next month. And I wonder if this fall there will be a major presidential endorsement coming from an artificially culturally supported couple.” Ramaswamy wrote on X (formerly Twitter). One name that has Republicans up in arms is George Soros, who appears to have played a role in Swift's career, albeit briefly. In the same way that Soros invests in liberal district attorneys in the blue states of the United States, it seems that the powerful financier also has a soft spot in his heart for pop divas. In 2019, Swift attacked Soros and “toxic male privilege” in the music industry, alleging that the billionaire had purchased her music catalog through underhanded shenanigans.
After I was denied the opportunity to purchase my music directly, my entire catalog was sold to Scooter Braun's Ithaca Holdings in a deal that I was told was financed by the Soros family, 23 Capital and the Carlyle Group." Swift revealed at the Billboard Women of the Decade Awards. 23 Capital is a financial company backed by Soros Fund Management, while in 1993 Soros invested $100 million in Carlyle Group, the shady company that was awarded million-dollar contracts to rebuild Iraqi infrastructure that the Pentagon destroyed during its invasion of 2003. Regarding Swift's catalog, she supposedly got it back after re-recording the entire work. Were there any stipulations for Swift to get her job back, such as perhaps promoting the Democratic Party, and more specifically Joe Biden? No one can say for sure, but theorists suspect that Swift could also be connected to another powerful entity. Few people would expect to find the names Pentagon and Taylor Swift in the same sentence, but that's what happened at a 2019 conference held by located in Tallinn, Estonia. As it turned out, the Pentagon's psychological unit used Swift as an example to confront "disinformation" online.
Many people on the right think there's something too artificial, too stagey, too polished and perfect about this American Love Story, as if some powerful puppeteer were manipulating the made-for-TV saga from on high. In fact, none other than former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy suggested that Swift and Kuwait Mobile Number List Kelce's relationship paved the way for some free Democratic Party advertising. READ MORE Biden wants Taylor Swift to sing for him wonder who will win the Super Bowl next month. And I wonder if this fall there will be a major presidential endorsement coming from an artificially culturally supported couple.” Ramaswamy wrote on X (formerly Twitter). One name that has Republicans up in arms is George Soros, who appears to have played a role in Swift's career, albeit briefly. In the same way that Soros invests in liberal district attorneys in the blue states of the United States, it seems that the powerful financier also has a soft spot in his heart for pop divas. In 2019, Swift attacked Soros and “toxic male privilege” in the music industry, alleging that the billionaire had purchased her music catalog through underhanded shenanigans.
After I was denied the opportunity to purchase my music directly, my entire catalog was sold to Scooter Braun's Ithaca Holdings in a deal that I was told was financed by the Soros family, 23 Capital and the Carlyle Group." Swift revealed at the Billboard Women of the Decade Awards. 23 Capital is a financial company backed by Soros Fund Management, while in 1993 Soros invested $100 million in Carlyle Group, the shady company that was awarded million-dollar contracts to rebuild Iraqi infrastructure that the Pentagon destroyed during its invasion of 2003. Regarding Swift's catalog, she supposedly got it back after re-recording the entire work. Were there any stipulations for Swift to get her job back, such as perhaps promoting the Democratic Party, and more specifically Joe Biden? No one can say for sure, but theorists suspect that Swift could also be connected to another powerful entity. Few people would expect to find the names Pentagon and Taylor Swift in the same sentence, but that's what happened at a 2019 conference held by located in Tallinn, Estonia. As it turned out, the Pentagon's psychological unit used Swift as an example to confront "disinformation" online.